The Best and Worst Sites of 2006

Like the rest of the world, I had to do some sort of recap. Admittedly, a few of these sites were not designed in 2006, but oh well:

The Best

1. Shaun Inman.com/post

Shaun Inman.com/post
This design I discovered only just last week, but it’s one of the most innovative (and certainly easy-to-read) designs I’ve ever seen. Not sure quite what to say about this though.

2. Nudo — Adopt and Olive Tree

Nudo -- Adopt an Olive Tree
It’s clean, cheerful, and I love the way they use the tree graphics.

3. Blacktree

Blacktree
I’m not super-impressed with the subpages, but I’m very fond of the home page. I also enjoy the contrast between the conservative serifed logotype and the more modern Gill Sans. Now if only the HTML were tidier.

4. Veerle’s Blog 2.0

Veerle's Blog 2.0
It’s colorful, happy, and I love it.

5. Slate

Slate Magazine
My favorite magazine relaunched their site over the summer after years on a stale old design. The new layout I like: it’s comfortable to read, and the home page is able to present a crap-load of information in a way that’s easy to digest. And though I ordinarily despise drop-down menus, I like what they’ve done for their navigation. Two complaints though: their forums are incredibly difficult to navigation and sign in to. Also, Slate has begun splitting longer articles on to multiple pages. :-(

The Worst

I’m feeling a little-bit toothless for only picking sites of major companies. But trust me, they’re all justified.

1. Apple

Apple.com
It’s not that it’s a inherently bad design, it’s just time for a change. Apple makes the best operating system out there and some of the best hardware — both with breath-takingly good design. So why is their site still stuck in a 7-year-old design?

2. America Online

America Online
(Or I suppose just AOL after their… uhh… “brilliant” April rebranding) This website is just plain ugly. I also find it sluggish and confusing (how come when I enter my zip code for weather it can’t take a wild leap of faith that I want that same zip code for local events? Why does the “News” headline have a picture of cutest mutant animals of 2006? I can customize the page, but why can my password only be 6 to 8 characters long?). Memorably non-standards-compliant to boot.

3. MySpace

MySpace
I suppose this goes without saying, but MySpace is awful. The home page is a dizzying array of ads and the user pages are a pandora’s box of bad HTML and even worse CSS. And now companies seem to have decided to jump on the Web 2.0 train to hell — Chili’s restaurants has been advertising their web address as http://myspace.com/chilis on their telivision ads for the past several months.

4. American Broadcasting Company

American Broadcasting Company website
I congratulate ABC for being the first major network to have complete episodes online, but their website is horrible. When I first loaded it up, my computer attacked me with a loud video that played without my consent. When I browse deepr, I realize that the subpages all seem to be using an older design. And why are they still redirecting me to a subdomain of Go.com (the long-dead web portal that CNET named one of the top dot-com web flops)?

5. MediaNewsGroup

MediaNews Group website
Straight out of 2001, the country’s perhaps least-favorite media company also has one of my least favorite websites.

No Responses to “The Best and Worst Sites of 2006”

Comments are closed.